ALL PAWS ON DECK – Cletus, a yellow lab, looks out from the deck of the F/V Jackpine this morning as ANB Harbor empties out. Today is the opening of the summer troll season and with good weather much of the Sitka fleet is now out on the fishing grounds. (Sentinel Photo by James Poulson)

The Movie Review: Robocop

By Daniel Olbrych

 

In 1987 Paul Verhoeven slapped moviegoers in the face with the hyper-violent and satirical “Robocop.” It was well received both critically and commercially. It even somehow managed to spawn a Saturday morning cartoon despite its being based on such violent subject matter. “Robocop” is part of our weird culture whether you like it or not: Murphy (“Robocop”) will soon stand 10 feet tall and made of bronze in Detroit’s Victoria Park.

But, hey, it’s been a while (21 years) since “Robocop” has graced the silver screen so you know that means … REBOOT! Yeah!

The new “Robocop” starts off strong. Samuel L. Jackson does his best Bill O’Reilly impression and the near future is believable. The year is 2028 and drone technology is being implemented around the world but not the United States. The Dreyfus Act is in effect, an anti-robot policy based on popular opinion that says the American people do not want a “machine” pulling the trigger. As luck – or misfortune – would have it, police officer Alex Murphy is fatally wounded and the only way to save him is to blend what’s left with robotic parts. Yadda, yadda, yadda. You get it.

This is, unfortunately, where the movie takes a turn for the worse. The political content melts away and what remains is a blase action affair. Jackson pops up from time to time as if to remind us of the political implications of what’s been taking place between Murphy and Omnicorp, the drone manufacturing company. This is similar to the news broadcasts seen in the original “Robocop,” but these O’Reilly Factor-esque sequences do not come across as satire because the rest of the film takes itself pretty seriously.

In addition to Jackson, we get solid performances by Gary Oldman, Michael Keaton and Jackie Earle Haley. They bring some energy to an otherwise lifeless cast. I’ve been a Keaton fan since Tim Burton’s “Batman” and it’s good to see him back on the big screen. Suffice it to say, he hasn’t missed a beat.

The problem, though, with this lineup is the gray portrayal of villainy. The original had bad guys ripping lines off call girls and blasting Murhpy’s arms off at close range, to name but a few of the things on the dirty deeds list. These new bad guys don’t seem all that bad; they’re just corporate.

Joel Kinnaman, who plays Robocop, is a master at being unimpressive. He’s so typical I couldn’t care less. I can’t criticize him, but he’s certainly not Peter Weller, from the original. Although Kinnaman is remarkably average, he comes across like an Academy Award winner when sharing screen time with Abbie Cornish. Cornish, who plays Robocop’s wife, is someone who should probably just stop acting.

There are no real characters. There just isn’t time for them between action beats. The bad guys aren’t very bad. The precinct is full of nameless cops doing busy work. We don’t know anything about anyone. And to top it off, Detroit seems pretty nice. Like, I’d-consider-moving-there nice. What happened to the dirt and grime? “Robocop” (1987) depicted a city in decay and Robocop was its savior. But here, there is no sense that we need a super cop.

There was a lot of potential and the first 15 minutes really tapped into that, but what follows is merely passable. Director José Padilha has skill but he has yet to strike. He makes this film work the best it can but I’m sure there is a better one on the cutting room floor and I expect we will see more from him with his next outing.

The surprise use of the original Robocop theme music is nice, but so sporadic, that it’s only loosely connected to the rest of the film score. It’s like it was thrown in to please fanboys. And I’m sure it was. It’s too bad that this throw-back attitude lingers over the entire movie, thus preventing much originality. God forbid we have that.

 

So where does that leave “Robocop”? It’s a movie that struggles to find itself, but remains entertaining. The new take on the subject matter suggests at one point there were bigger ideas than what ended up being in the final cut. “Robocop” is better the farther it stands from the original. But face to face, ’87 “Robocop” could punch a hole right through this new model.

______________________

 

Alaska COVID-19
At a Glance

(updated 7-1-20)

By Sentinel Staff

The state Department of Health and Social Services has posted the following update on the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Alaska as of 11:15 a.m. Wednesday.

New cases as of Monday: 38

Total statewide – 978

Total (cumulative) deaths – 14

Active cases in Sitka – 8 (5 resident; 3 non-resident)

Recovered cases in Sitka – 11 (8 resident; 3 non-resident)

The state says the cumulative number of cases hospitalized is 68.

To visit the Alaska DHSS Corona Response dashboard website click here.

______________________

 

Welcome to the Sitka Sentinel's web page. In order to make the Sentinel's news more easily available during the COVID-19 pandemic, we have taken down the paywall to access articles on this page. Just click on an article headline to read the story. 

March 23, 2020

NOTICE FROM THE PUBLISHERS

TO READERS AND ADVERTISERS

For the duration of the COVID-19 disaster emergency declared by federal, state and local authorities, the Sentinel is taking additional measures to reduce virus exposure to its employees and contractors as well as to the public, while continuing to publish a daily news report for Sitka.

To the extent possible, Sentinel news and sales staff will be working from home. For the protection of our carriers, home delivery of the newspaper will be stopped effective Tuesday, March 24.

The Sentinel will continue to publish on its website sitkasentinel.com. Access to the website will be free to all users. The Sentinel will also produce a print edition Monday through Friday. It will be available to all readers without charge, at locations throughout town.

Initially, these locations are those where the Sentinel's newspaper vending machines are already in place. The coin mechanisms will be disabled or the doors removed to permit easy access. The Sentinel will work with the stores where the paper is usually sold, to designate a place inside or outside the store where the free edition can be made available.  

Home delivery subscriptions are on hold, and after the end of the disaster emergency, subscriptions will be extended at no charge for the number of days that there was no home delivery.

The Sentinel will make its print edition available to the public as early in the day as possible. with all personnel taking precautions to prevent spread of the virus.

The Sentinel is calling upon its customers to observe the COVID-19 emergency precautions already in place, particularly in maintaining a six-foot social distance from others at newspaper distribution sites.

Following is the statement issued by the Sentinel on March 16, stating the Sentinel's emergency procedures, which remain in effect.

The Sentinel office at 112 Barracks Street is closed to the public. We encourage people to use the phone, email or the U.S. Postal Service as much as possible.There is a slot in the front door of the office for ads, news items and payment checks. Emails may be sent to  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and the phone number is (907) 747-3219.                                                                          

Login Form

Most recent Sentinels — PDF edition

June 25, 2020

June 26, 2020

June 29, 2020

June 30, 2020

July 1, 2020

Facebook

calendar