OPEN AIR CONCERT – From left, musicians Ross Venneberg, Brian Neal, Wade Demmert and Roger Schmidt perform an outdoor brass concert for residents of the Pioneers Home Monday. The professional musicians, who are hunkered down in Sitka, are regulars at the annual Holiday Brass Concert. The Pioneers Home has been closed to visitors during the pandemic. (Sentinel Photo by James Poulson)

Sitkans Step Up Roadless Rule Advocacy

By SHANNON HAUGLAND
Sentinel Staff Writer
    Conservation groups, fishermen and tribal governments from across Southeast Alaska are coming together to state their opposition to exempting the Tongass National Forest from the 2001 National Roadless Rule as proposed by the U.S. Forest Service.
    Opponents of a new Alaska-specific rule favored by the Forest Service object to opening new areas of old growth timber for clearcutting, rolling back restoration work under way and the threat to salmon habitat posed by removing the protections of the national Roadless Rule. The 60-day period for comment on the six alternatives under consideration for the Tongass ends Dec. 17.
    The Forest Service summarized:
    “Alternative 6 (preferred) would exempt the Tongass National Forest from the 2001 Roadless Rule and is fully responsive to the State of Alaska’s petition. The alternative would remove all 9.2 million acres of inventoried roadless acres and would convert 165,000 old-growth acres and 20,000 young-growth acres previously identified as unsuitable timber lands to suitable timber lands. Conservation of roadless values would be achieved through other means, including the Tongass Land Management Plan. This is specific to the Tongass National Forest. The Chugach National Forest would remain under the 2001 Roadless Rule.”
    The Sitka Conservation Society hosted a public presentation on the Roadless Rule Tuesday that drew a turnout of around 60 Sitkans to hear information on the proposal to exempt the Tongass from the national rule.
    SCS Policy Engagement Director Katie Riley said their event was a chance for Sitkans to discuss reasons the protection of the national Roadless Rule are important to them and the health of the America’s largest national forest, and to offer guidance on writing and submitting comments to the Forest Service.
    The Forest Service will have a public meeting and subsistence hearing on the proposed Alaska Roadless Rule Nov. 12 at Harrigan Centennial Hall. (See related story.)
    The alternatives up for comment under the draft environmental impact statement range from “No Action” to the specific plan for the Tongass favored by the Forest Service.
    National and Alaska-based environmental and conservation organizations have already weighed in, opposing the easing of the protections against development provided by the national Roadless Rule, joined by individual fishermen from throughout the region, at least one municipality, and a number of tribal governments.
    Riley said the groups she’s working with advocate for the “no action” alternative, which would leave the Roadless Rule in place.
    The Forest Service’s “preferred alternative” – alternative 6 – would exempt the Tongass National Forest from the 2001 national Roadless Rule, and enact an Alaska-specific rule that would affect 9.2 million acres of inventoried roadless areas in the forest.
    Gov. Bill Walker opened the door for a new forest management policy in 2018 when he invited the Forest Service to consider adopting a special plan for Alaska. Mike Dunleavy, who succeeded Walker as governor, has enthusiastically advocated for a Roadless Rule exemption for Alaska, joining President Trump, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, and all three members of Alaska’s Republican Congressional delegation.
    Dunleavy, who attributed the decline of the timber industry in Southeast to the 2001 national rule, said in an Oct. 15 press release, “Alternative 6 is fully responsive to the State of Alaska’s petition to completely remove the Tongass National Forest from the Roadless Rule.”

Fishermen in Opposition
    Among opponents to the preferred alternative are hundreds of fishermen and a number of tribal governments, who have been sending in their comments and the reason for their concerns.
    Sitka Conservation Society and the Alaska Longline Fishermen’s Association said in a joint news release this week that more than 200 area fishermen signed a letter sent to U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue to request that the Forest Service “protect fish habitat, complete restoration work and phase out industrial scale clearcutting on the Tongass.”
    “Please protect our livelihoods and Alaska’s salmon spawning grounds by selecting an alternative that broadly protects fish habitat, continues the phase-out of industrial scale old growth clear cutting and prioritizes the restoration of degraded watersheds and streams,” the fishermen said in the letter to Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue and U.S.Forest Service Chief Vicki Christiansen.
     The SCS/ALFA news release included comments submitted to the Forest Service by a number of the concerned fishermen.
    “These areas are more valuable left intact than being cut for short-term gain,” said Cheston Clark, a Sitka salmon troller.
    Lexi Fish, who fishes on the F/V Myriad, commented: “Healthy salmon runs are an increasingly rare commodity on this planet. Roads, buildings, and urban development, on the other hand, are all over the place. We need to keep our corner of the world wild and roadless - our salmon, forests, and rural communities depend on it.”
    Jeff Farvour of the F/V Apollo said the Tongass should be managed for the long-term, wide-sweeping services, such as fish habitat. He noted that salmon are experiencing tough environmental challenges, which will be exacerbated by rolling back the Roadless Rule.
    “Here in Southeast Alaska we recently had four salmon runs listed as Stocks of Concern, we’ve had multi years of record droughts with 2019 in Southeast Alaska cited as one of the worst droughts in the nation, record low pink runs, coho runs that are below long-term and recent averages,” he said.
    At the same time, Farvour added, Southeast had two of the biggest ocean warming events ever seen in the Pacific Ocean.
    “Even the best road building techniques will impact salmon – so what is the plan to ensure fish and their habitat are not impacted, for maintaining any new roads into perpetuity?” he asked.
    Riley said even with the scores of Sitkans who have already submitted their comments, more keep walking in the door at SCS, saying, “What can I do? How can I help?”

Tribal Opposition
    Tribal governments weighing in from Southeast include the Organized Village of Kasaan, Angoon Cooperative Association, the Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska, Hydaburg Cooperative Association and the Organized Village of Kake.
    Representatives of the organizations signed a joint two-page letter to Agriculture Secretary Purdue, objecting to the exemption of Alaska from the national Roadless Rule, and to a process that they said violated their status as “cooperating agencies” under the National Environmental Policy Act.
    “We are profoundly disappointed with the manner the Roadless Rule exemption process has been handled, especially as regards the federally recognized tribes that involved themselves as ‘cooperating agencies,’” the letter said. “... The U.S. Forest Service plowed recklessly ahead at a frantic pace to satisfy a predetermined timeline.”
    The organizations said they came to the table as partners, and provided comments on the six alternatives, which they said represented a variety of compromises between maintaining Roadless Area characteristics while allowing for infrastructure construction, and economic development.
    “We spent or own time, money and energy to invest in creating a workable compromise for the communities of Southeast Alaska to this longstanding controversial issue,” said Joel Jackson, president of the Organized Village of Kake.
    Jackson noted the tribes later learned the Forest Service gave the state $2 million as a cooperating agency, and the Alaska Forest Association $200,000 for providing expertise.
    “For many tribal leaders, this is another indignation and example of environmental injustice as many Alaska Native communities bear the brunt of the climate change impacts and extraction policies that disrupt if not destroy the ecosystems they have come to rely upon while their concerns and voices are ignored,” Jackson said.
    The Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, representing American Indians and Alaska Natives, and tribes in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Northern California and Alaska, met in October and adopted a resolution supporting the No Action alternative.

Municipal Opposition
    The city of Skagway passed a resolution on Oct. 24 in support of the No Action Alternative and opposing Alternative 6, the Forest Service’s Preferred Alternative.
    In Sitka, Assembly member Kevin Knox said he plans to introduce a resolution to the Assembly expressing the city’s support for the No Action alternative.
    Speaking of the meetings the Forest Service is now holding around Southeast, agency spokesman Paul Robbins explained that the format at each will have two parts. The first part is an hour-and-a-half “public meeting,” at which an overview of the rulemaking process and the Roadless alternatives, including the Preferred Alternative, will be presented. Written comments may be given at that time, he said. The second part of each community meeting will be a two-hour “subsistence hearing,” at which comments from the public will be “recorded and transcribed public testimony” related to subsistence.
    The Forest Service Roadless Rule meeting and subsistence hearing in Sitka will be held Nov. 12 at Centennial Hall. The public meeting portion will be 5 to 6:30 p.m. and the subsistence hearing will be 7 to 9 p.m.
    Comments may be submitted several ways.
    Web: www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=54511
    Email: akroadlessrule@fs.fed.us
    Mail: USDA Forest Service, Attn: Alaska Roadless Rule, P.O. Box 21628, Juneau, Alaska, 99802
    Fax: 907-586-7852
    In-person delivery to Forest Service, 709 W. 9th Street, Room 535B, Juneau, Alaska 99801

You have no rights to post comments

______________________

 

Alaska COVID-19
At a Glance

(updated 7-7-20)

By Sentinel Staff

The state Department of Health and Social Services has posted the following update on the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Alaska as of 11:15 p.m. Tuesday.

New cases as of Sunday: 19

Total statewide – 1,184

Total (cumulative) deaths – 17

Active cases in Sitka – 8 (3 resident; 5 non-resident)

Recovered cases in Sitka – 12 (10 resident; 2 non-resident)

The state says the cumulative number of cases hospitalized is 78.

To visit the Alaska DHSS Corona Response dashboard website click here.

______________________

 

Welcome to the Sitka Sentinel's web page. In order to make the Sentinel's news more easily available during the COVID-19 pandemic, we have taken down the paywall to access articles on this page. Just click on an article headline to read the story. 

March 23, 2020

NOTICE FROM THE PUBLISHERS

TO READERS AND ADVERTISERS

For the duration of the COVID-19 disaster emergency declared by federal, state and local authorities, the Sentinel is taking additional measures to reduce virus exposure to its employees and contractors as well as to the public, while continuing to publish a daily news report for Sitka.

To the extent possible, Sentinel news and sales staff will be working from home. For the protection of our carriers, home delivery of the newspaper will be stopped effective Tuesday, March 24.

The Sentinel will continue to publish on its website sitkasentinel.com. Access to the website will be free to all users. The Sentinel will also produce a print edition Monday through Friday. It will be available to all readers without charge, at locations throughout town.

Initially, these locations are those where the Sentinel's newspaper vending machines are already in place. The coin mechanisms will be disabled or the doors removed to permit easy access. The Sentinel will work with the stores where the paper is usually sold, to designate a place inside or outside the store where the free edition can be made available.  

Home delivery subscriptions are on hold, and after the end of the disaster emergency, subscriptions will be extended at no charge for the number of days that there was no home delivery.

The Sentinel will make its print edition available to the public as early in the day as possible. with all personnel taking precautions to prevent spread of the virus.

The Sentinel is calling upon its customers to observe the COVID-19 emergency precautions already in place, particularly in maintaining a six-foot social distance from others at newspaper distribution sites.

Following is the statement issued by the Sentinel on March 16, stating the Sentinel's emergency procedures, which remain in effect.

The Sentinel office at 112 Barracks Street is closed to the public. We encourage people to use the phone, email or the U.S. Postal Service as much as possible.There is a slot in the front door of the office for ads, news items and payment checks. Emails may be sent to  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and the phone number is (907) 747-3219.                                                                          

Login Form

Most recent Sentinels — PDF edition

 

July 1, 2020

July 2, 2020

July 6, 2020

July 7, 2020

July 8, 2020

Facebook

calendar